The Left’s Road To Hell

“Every national appeal is now made, not to the Noblest and the Best, but to the riff-raff – the slave hordes – who possess less intelligence than night-owls. All that is brave, honorable, heroic is ignored tacitly, for fear of offending the deified Herd, ‘the Majority’. “Equality of conditions” is its debasing shibboleth and verily ,he who has temerity enough to spit upon Equality is liable to be horned to death.”

– Might Is Right – Raganar RedBeard, 1890
PARIS, FRANCE – APRIL 23: Picture taken 23 April 1993 in Paris of American geneticist James Dewey Watson in front of a blackboard, explaining his work to discover the molecular structure on DNA for which he shared the 1962 Physiology and Medicine Nobel Prize with British Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins. James Dewey Watson, one of the most important researchers in field of genetics, was born 06 April 1928 in Chicago, Ill. In 1950, Watson joined Cavendish Laboratories where many others important people were trying to determine the makeup of DNA. It was Watson and Crick who made the next big discovery. They proposed that DNA was a winding helix in which pairs of bases held the srands together. This model of DNA double helix became an important item of reserch in the areas of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics. AFP PHOTO DANIEL MORDZINSKI (Photo credit should read DANIEL MORDZINSKI/AFP/Getty Images)

One of the world’s most eminent scientists, Dr. James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in unravelling the mysteries of DNA lost everything after affirming what Ragnar RedBeard said back in 1890 concerning the innate inequality among the races.

Dr. Watson now apparently desperate for money had little choice but to hawk his Nobel Prize medal which he received back in 1962 for discovering the structure of DNA, and as he put it “no-one really wants to admit I exist”.

Just goes to show, that if you go against the asinine doctrines of the ‘deified herd’ they will trample you beneath their hooves. The truth sounds like hate to those who hate the truth.

Many so called “skeptics” like to claim that science weeds out bias via peer review etc, but the truth is that the scientific community will ignore facts, when it doesn’t suit their leftist ideology. (For those of you who think the peer review process hasn’t been corrupted by leftist academia click here.)

Even if one was unbiased, it doesn’t matter because you can’t get funding to study or research anything that threatens the social justice dogma of this decadent age. Even if you some how had the monetary means to do so, you’d better fudge your findings (or keep them to yourself) or the establishment will crucify you and you too will lose everything. I can understand why so many academics are afraid to speak out. If you think about it, to be an academic usually means that you have invested many yrs of your life studying a particular field and have sunk hundreds of thousands of dollars into your education to get the necessary credentials. It is very hard to risk losing all of that, just to speak an inconvenient truth. However, as I see it, we only live once. If one can’t be true to one’s self, if one can’t speak one’s mind, if one must prostrate himself before the standards of the herd, then it isn’t worth it. I just can’t stomach herd conformity not for any amount of notoriety, recognition, or monetary success.

“The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.”

– Friedrich Nietzsche

But let’s face it. Most people aren’t like this, most people will never have the courage to buck the system. Most people are ignorant herd animals, devoid of originality, and intellect. And most people find great comfort in conformity. And it is these types who will seek to crush you, if you “speak truth to power” because to do so, is to threaten the very system which props them up.

Dr. Watson told The Sunday Times that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”. He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal (I say this desire isn’t natural but ingrained via indoctrination) but “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.”

He said that “There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so.”

Nature doesn’t do equal. And isn’t this what we would expect given the fact of evolution via natural selection?? Is it really reasonable to think that various isolated groups of human primate, who have undergone different environmental pressures should have all of the same capacities? Is it reasonable to expect that somehow natural selection gave these isolated populations differences in testosterone, differences in skin pigment, differences in muscle fiber, differences in bone density and structure, differences in proclivity to disease, but not differences in iq? As if this 3 pound organ within our skull was some how magically impervious to selective pressures? This is purely a faith position.

Of course it is easy for the average evolutionist to admit differences in skin tone, but in a racially mixed society which values iq (with good reason) it is incredibly controversial to admit in-group differences in intellect. But why? Because, the average rube has been indoctrinated with the sentiments that all people are created equal, and that we should all be treated equally under the law (slave morality). They think that if it is true that some human groups have less average intelligence than others, that this will lead to racial tensions, another holocaust, or racial supremacism.

In my view, these innate differences illustrate the incompatibilities between races of men and the importance of separation. And until we separate, until we deal with reality on its own terms, we can’t fix the mess that the equality delusion has created. The races are not equal, and operating upon this false premise is insanity. Pouring money into minority communities doesn’t fix the achievement gap for the same reasons black Africa didn’t have civilization until the Europeans brought it there. Colonialism was in some respects beneficial to non white indigenous people’s and it is asinine to expect low iq populations to create or maintain civilization. It is absurd to expect equal outcomes for all peoples when all populations are not equal.

It is easy for rich white liberals to wax poetic about the “wonders of diversity” and equality from the comforts of their gated communities, but what will the average basic bitch civic nationalist do, when there is no place left to “white flight” to? When everywhere looks like California and there are no more “good schools”? Many of our European cities (this includes the USA) are already beginning to resemble the mud-hut shitholes from which these contemptuous creatures originate. As whites continue to inch their way toward demographic obliteration. As the right continues its spiral decent into electoral oblivion. As non whites continue to impose ever more costs on European peoples, expect ever more exuberant levels of racial animosity. Expect civil war! Truly, the road to Hell is paved with “good” intentions.

“You may trace Equality in letters of silver on tablets of burnished gold, but without engineering a “perpetual miracle, you can not make it – true.”

– Might is Right – Ragnar Redbeard

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *